<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes from the grammar desk.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/</link>
	<description>A designer in Atlanta writes about technology, design, Macs, and life in Atlanta&#039;s Virginia-Highland neighborhood.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5tein</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>5tein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>When you print that shirt, sign me up for a black one, size medium please. Having a Masters in linguistics I recognize the argument this poor brainwashed po-mo is _trying_ to imply, but it really doesn&#039;t hold water and as you all have pointed out, he&#039;s taking it much too far.  A very typical po-mo argumentative tendency is to say, if it&#039;s not completely white, its just the same as black.  I daresay that type of reasoning falls into the category of logical fallacies, but I&#039;m know for a fact that po-mo &quot;critics&quot; have antiquated the idea of logic a long time ago as well.

&quot;&#039;Linguists drool, prescriptivists rule&#039;&quot;, heh heh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you print that shirt, sign me up for a black one, size medium please. Having a Masters in linguistics I recognize the argument this poor brainwashed po-mo is _trying_ to imply, but it really doesn&#8217;t hold water and as you all have pointed out, he&#8217;s taking it much too far.  A very typical po-mo argumentative tendency is to say, if it&#8217;s not completely white, its just the same as black.  I daresay that type of reasoning falls into the category of logical fallacies, but I&#8217;m know for a fact that po-mo &#8220;critics&#8221; have antiquated the idea of logic a long time ago as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Linguists drool, prescriptivists rule&#8217;&#8221;, heh heh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhubarb</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>rhubarb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Well, I *am* a born nit-picker, and I&#039;ve cultivated the nasty habit all my life.  After reading this highly entertaining thread (brought to me today by Google, in response to a search for the etymology of the term &quot;snark&quot; as it&#039;s used today), I cruised over to the site you cited, and what a sight it is.  I only had to scroll down to an entry dated August 12 to find this gem:  &quot;...But since the U.S. release date continues to move, shift, push, and allude us, I&#039;ve decided to diffuse the tension by offering a few trailers for upcoming films that look equally exquisite...&quot;  Two for one!  And twice two for one, because now I have the duel (heh) pleasure of reading your blog for good writing, and his for the postmodern-something-something viewpoint I so severely lack.  One of these days, I swear, I&#039;m going to get a t-shirt printed with &quot;Linguists drool, prescriptivists rule.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I *am* a born nit-picker, and I&#8217;ve cultivated the nasty habit all my life.  After reading this highly entertaining thread (brought to me today by Google, in response to a search for the etymology of the term &#8220;snark&#8221; as it&#8217;s used today), I cruised over to the site you cited, and what a sight it is.  I only had to scroll down to an entry dated August 12 to find this gem:  &#8220;&#8230;But since the U.S. release date continues to move, shift, push, and allude us, I&#8217;ve decided to diffuse the tension by offering a few trailers for upcoming films that look equally exquisite&#8230;&#8221;  Two for one!  And twice two for one, because now I have the duel (heh) pleasure of reading your blog for good writing, and his for the postmodern-something-something viewpoint I so severely lack.  One of these days, I swear, I&#8217;m going to get a t-shirt printed with &#8220;Linguists drool, prescriptivists rule.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Korte</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Korte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Gee. I have to say that, in some perverse way, I am impressed with this guy. You don&#039;t normally see anyone so passionately committed to anything anymore. It is a pity it is misdirected into something so pointless. Like some bad &quot;friend&quot; character in a new sitcom arguing the advantage of aerosol cheese over a block of cheddar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee. I have to say that, in some perverse way, I am impressed with this guy. You don&#8217;t normally see anyone so passionately committed to anything anymore. It is a pity it is misdirected into something so pointless. Like some bad &#8220;friend&#8221; character in a new sitcom arguing the advantage of aerosol cheese over a block of cheddar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neddie Jingo</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Neddie Jingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just realized, [his] second riposte is rollickin&#039; fun if read out loud (oh, shit, do I mean &quot;out loudly&quot;?) in the voice of The Simpsons&#039; Comic Book Guy. 

JCB, where did you drop your original comment? All I see is [post] 0 Comments... [post] 0 Comments... [post] 0 Comments... 

(Mind you, speaking as a Reformed Professional Grammar Pedant, I do have to wag an admonishing finger: Correcting strangers&#039; grammar unbidden is less than gentlemanly. [He] behaved like a complete sphincter, but it&#039;s not as though he was unbaited. I find an unsolicited language lesson in my Comments section one day -- especially one as sparse as [his] -- I might get a little testy too.)

Now let me carry on without the nuisance of your insolence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just realized, [his] second riposte is rollickin&#8217; fun if read out loud (oh, shit, do I mean &#8220;out loudly&#8221;?) in the voice of The Simpsons&#8217; Comic Book Guy. </p>
<p>JCB, where did you drop your original comment? All I see is [post] 0 Comments&#8230; [post] 0 Comments&#8230; [post] 0 Comments&#8230; </p>
<p>(Mind you, speaking as a Reformed Professional Grammar Pedant, I do have to wag an admonishing finger: Correcting strangers&#8217; grammar unbidden is less than gentlemanly. [He] behaved like a complete sphincter, but it&#8217;s not as though he was unbaited. I find an unsolicited language lesson in my Comments section one day &#8212; especially one as sparse as [his] &#8212; I might get a little testy too.)</p>
<p>Now let me carry on without the nuisance of your insolence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcburns</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>jcburns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all here, such as it is...my comment never made it past his blog&#039;s moderation, so I decided to move my discussion of it here, to our forum...the people&#039;s court!
I just said in my unapproved comment &quot;it&#039;s slowly, not slow&quot;, and &quot;grammar is important.&quot;
I&#039;m not a born nitpicker (as folks will tell you, I&#039;m a bit of a mess in many ways.) I do, however, see typos onscreen and in print at 100 yards, and grammar mistakes like this fall into that category. I have been known to call into CNN in the old days and correct a misspelled super, however...I mean, heck, that stuff&#039;s going out for the whole world to see..uh..um. Oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all here, such as it is&#8230;my comment never made it past his blog&#8217;s moderation, so I decided to move my discussion of it here, to our forum&#8230;the people&#8217;s court!<br />
I just said in my unapproved comment &#8220;it&#8217;s slowly, not slow&#8221;, and &#8220;grammar is important.&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m not a born nitpicker (as folks will tell you, I&#8217;m a bit of a mess in many ways.) I do, however, see typos onscreen and in print at 100 yards, and grammar mistakes like this fall into that category. I have been known to call into CNN in the old days and correct a misspelled super, however&#8230;I mean, heck, that stuff&#8217;s going out for the whole world to see..uh..um. Oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 01:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Sorry to have repeated what Ashley said... I didn&#039;t realize she had provided the same information between the time I read JC&#039;s post and when I posted my comment. Mea culpa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to have repeated what Ashley said&#8230; I didn&#8217;t realize she had provided the same information between the time I read JC&#8217;s post and when I posted my comment. Mea culpa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 00:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Joan...echo..echo...echo...echo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joan&#8230;echo..echo&#8230;echo&#8230;echo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivelyatlantaga.com/2006/03/15/notes-from-the-grammar-desk/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>A bit of Googling suggests that he&#039;s a graduate student in the English department of University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 

I feel sorry for his students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of Googling suggests that he&#8217;s a graduate student in the English department of University of Nebraska-Lincoln. </p>
<p>I feel sorry for his students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

